One of the significant changes required by the new accounting guidance under ASU 2014 09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) relates to accounting for uninstalled materials. Under the previous accounting practice, the cost of materials specifically produced, fabricated, or constructed for a project, including those not yet installed, were to be included in the inputs used to measure the percentage of completion on the project. This would ultimately drive the revenue recognized to date on the contract. If not specifically produced, fabricated, or constructed for a project, the cost of the materials would have been capitalized on the balance sheet and reported as inventory until installed.
Under ASU 2014 09, the cost of uninstalled materials that were not specific to a contract should be accounted for in a similar manner as inventory. However, in most cases, the amount of the uninstalled materials would also need to be removed from both the transaction price and estimated project cost before applying the cost to cost input method for recognizing revenue-to-date on the contract.
A contractor is engaged in a $26 million fixed price contract to construct a new bridge which includes the installation of steel beams. The estimated total cost of the project to the contractor is $20 million, including $4 million for the steel beams. As of December 31, 2018, the contractor incurred $8 million in costs, including the $4 million of steel beams, which have been purchased and delivered to the site but have not been installed.
To calculate the revenue that the contractor should recognize to date under the new standard, the calculation using the cost-to-cost input method would need to be adjusted first by subtracting the $4 million for the uninstalled steel beams from the $8 million in total costs incurred to date and the $20 million in total estimated costs and then divide the two to determine progress toward completion, which is 25% ($4 million divided by $16 million). The contractor would also subtract the $4 million for the steel beams from the $26 million contract price before multiplying it by the progress (25%) and then add the $4 million for the steel beams back in, resulting in a current total of $9.5 million in revenue to be recognized ($22 million times 25%, plus $4 million).
Under the previous accounting practice, if the $4 million for the steel beams was included in the calculation of progress towards satisfaction of the performance obligation, the measurement of progress would have been overestimated and $10.4 million of revenue would have been recognized. Therefore, the impact of implementing ASU 2014 09 is a reduction in revenue recognition of $900,000, which represents the potential gross profit on the uninstalled steel beams. Under ASU 2014 09, the profit is deferred and will be recognized once the steel beams are installed.
Customer-furnished goods under ASU 2014-09
Customer furnished goods, such as materials or equipment, will also need to be addressed under the new standard. Under the previous accounting practice, the value of goods supplied by the customer is added to contract revenues and costs only if the contractor bears the risk of nature, type, characteristics, specification, or ultimate performance of such goods within the overall project incremental costs. Under ASU 2014 09, the fair value of goods furnished by customers shall be considered a noncash consideration, estimated, and included in the transaction price and estimated costs, with no gross profit recognized. If the contractor controls customer contributed equipment or services, the fair value of such noncash consideration should also be estimated and included in the transaction price.
The new standard requires the contractor to account for certain costs differently than current practices, and this could significantly affect the amount of revenue to be recognized during progress towards satisfaction of the performance obligation. With lack of software modifications, contractors will have to find alternative strategies to properly account for and present these costs. We recommend that you consider reviewing current contract and job costing practices to identify if any of these matters requiring new accounting methods will apply to your business.
Following the monumental 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc. which made it constitutional for states to tax sales made by vendors that have no in-state physical presence, Texas has rolled out new economic nexus standards that require...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) members voted unanimously to propose moving back the effective date for lease accounting and two other major new accounting standards until January 1, 2021. The FASB is the independent, private-sector,...
Section 199A provides a 20% deduction on the amount of Qualified Business Income (referred to as QBI and defined later) from a domestic business operated as a partnership, S-Corporation, sole proprietorship, trust or estate. This deduction is in response to the...